US considering expanding missile attacks on Pakistan
Written by Joe O'Donnell on March 18, 2009 – 9:14 am -Imagine that Mexico was blowing up drug dealer houses in remote areas of Texas with guided missiles. These missiles actually end up killing more poor Americans than Mexican drug dealers, but the US government allows Mexico to continue the attacks. Then Mexico says that most of the drug dealers are actually near San Antonio, so it’s considering raining down missiles there. How do you think the American public would react?
US considering more missile attacks on Pakistan
It’s pretty much impossible not to conclude that the US government is trying to provoke a gulf of tonkin incident or a second 911. Except this time with a nuclear armed highly unstable country.
Posted in Uncategorized |
March 18th, 2009 at 11:57 am
This is Obama’s pragmatic warmongering. So how many people has Obama killed now? Thousands, right?
March 18th, 2009 at 12:24 pm
It’s at least 1700 in Iraq alone:
http://obamabodycount.org/
Afghanistan probably adds a few hundred more.
March 18th, 2009 at 12:44 pm
And Pakistan adds … what … it’s gotta be over a hundred by this point, right? So, yet again, our President has innocent blood on his hands. And this is simply accepted as a fact of life living in our “progressive global age.” Absolutely disgusting…
March 18th, 2009 at 1:15 pm
It’s around 66 as far as the news has reported:
1-24: 22
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/24/pakistan-urges-obama-to-h_n_160584.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7847423.stm
1-30: 12
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/29/AR2008012903173.html
3-1: 8
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE52017G20090301?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews
3-12: 24
http://www.truthout.org/031309R
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/03/13/2516097.htm
Yes, this is a stark example of moral relativism. When unquestioned governments are allowed to judge morality as they wish, the expected and always inevitable result is mass murder. That’s because a monopoly justice provider, in other words a government, is nothing but ever growing pure force.
As Lenin saw his goal of ‘the dictatorship of the proletariat’:
The scientific concept, dictatorship, means neither more nor less than unlimited power resting directly on force, not limited by anything, not restrained by any laws or any absolute rules. Nothing else but that.
V.I. Lenin, A Contribution to the History of the Question of Dictatorship
March 18th, 2009 at 2:04 pm
Liberals should easily see the hazards of government without limits.